Annual Report
2006/2007

Table of Contents

Part 1: Organization

Part 2: Panel Operations

Interior Panel

Island Panel

Kootenay Panel

North Panel

Okanagan Panel

South Coast Panel

Part 3: Statistics

Part 4: Strategic Planning and Policy

Part 5: Mapping and GIS

Part 6: Finanancial Report

Part 2.3: Kootenay Panel Region

Members:Monika Marshall (Vice-Chair), Carmen Purdy, D. Grant Griffin

  • Message from the Vice-Chair
  • Map of Interior Panel Region
  • Panel Statistics (April 1, 2006 - March 31, 2007)
  • Applications of Interest
  • Issues of Interest

    Download: Part 2 (3.5MB) | 2.3 Kootenay Panel Region (576KB) | Full Report (3.7MB)

    __________________________________________

    Message from the Vice-Chair

    The Panel experienced continuing pressure on the ALR for resort development during the year, particularly in the East Kootenay area. This pressure and the on-going difficulties being experienced in the ranching sector highlighted two important issues:

    • The need to identify the key issues affecting the future of agriculture in the region and review the ALR in the light of these issues, and

    • The importance of working with the regional district and stakeholder groups to develop a new land use strategy for the Columbia Trench that reflects the needs of the agriculture community in light of the pressures from the resort and development sectors.

    In recent years the Panel has had a growing concern with regard to the number of conservation covenants that propose to significantly restrict agricultural activity. During this past year three such covenants were reviewed by the Panel none of which were approved. Discussions were held during the year with conservation groups to explain that without proper consideration of agricultural values, the registration of conservation covenants can significantly impact the agricultural economy in the Kootenays. While respecting the overall objectives of conservation covenants the Panel does not believe they should be used to eliminate or significantly restrict agriculture. More discussion is needed in this regard.



    Back to top
    __________________________________________

    Map of Kootenay Panel Region

    Area of Panel Region: 6,648,656 hectares

    Area in ALR : 382,946 hectares

    Kootenay Panel Region



    Back to top
    __________________________________________

    Panel Statistics (April 1, 2006 - March 31, 2007)

    Number of Applications Received by Type

    # of Applications

    Exclusions

    Inclusions

    Non-Farm Use & Subdivision

    103

    14

    1

    88

    Area Included and Excluded and Agriculture Capability

    Refused

    Approved

    Agriculture Capability of Approved

    Prime

    Mixed

    Secondary

    Inclusion Area

    (hectares)

    0

    1

    0

    0

    1

    Exclusion Area (hectares)

    5

    353

    0

    259

    94

    Plans and Bylaws Reviewed

    Category

    Area

    Number

    Official Community Plans

    Regional District of
    Kootenay Boundary

    Regional District of
    East Kootenay

    1

    3

    Implementing Bylaws

    Zoning, subdivision & other bylaws

    Kimberley

    1

    Utility and Energy Projects

    Utility & infrastructure corridors

    Waneta Expansion Project

    1

    Boundary Adjustments

    Changes in local government boundaries

    Cranbrook

    1

    Conservation Covenants

    Regional District of East Kootenay

    3

    TOTAL

    10



    Back to top
    __________________________________________

    Applications of Interest

    The following selected examples illustrate how the Agricultural Land Commission panels responded to proposals to change the ALR boundary or to requests for subdivision or non-farm use of ALR lands. Applications are considered on the merits of each case at hand in the context of the Commission's mandate and take into account an assessment of factors related to agricultural capability and suitability and impact upon the ALR.

    Braund, #L-36540

    In September 2006, the Panel considered a proposal on land near Windermere Lake, to develop a private, not for profit, 18-hole golf course facility on a portion of two properties totaling 164 ha.

    The Panel toured the property and met with the applicant and agent in June 2006.

    It was noted the property is an operating ranch. In the Panel's view, the land had agricultural capability and it did not believe that there were external factors that rendered the land unsuitable for agricultural use. The Panel was also concerned that the proposal would negatively impact existing or potential agricultural use of the subject property and surrounding lands in the long term. The application was denied.

    Waneta Expansion Power Corporation, #Q-36529

    This application was part of the Waneta Hydro-Electric Expansion Project requiring approximately 9.8 km of new transmission line to be constructed to connect the Waneta Dam Expansion Power Plant to the Selkirk substation. The majority of the new transmission line was to be located on Crown or private land outside of the ALR with the exception of a 1.5 ha area near Castlegar.

    The Panel visited the site of the proposed transmission line in May 2006 and found that there are some pasture lands and existing hay fields that have already been impacted by two existing utility corridors in the vicinity. In the Panel's view, this aspect of the proposal, as it affects the ALR, was an essential part of the overall project which was benefiting the region as a whole. The Panel believed that the transmission line within the ALR would not alter or hinder the existing farm activities in the vicinity provided adequate measures were taken to prevent the spread of noxious weeds.



    Back to top
    __________________________________________

    Issues of Interest

    The following selected example illustrates how the integration and coordination of interests regarding land use planning and resource management require ongoing dialogue and collaboration between local governments and the Agricultural Land Commission.

    The Panel has, in recent years, noticed a significant increase in the number of applications coming from the East Kootenay area for resort and residential development within the ALR. This together with the difficulties being experienced by the ranching industry has prompted the Panel to engage the regional district in planning processes that incorporate specific strategies for preserving agricultural land, bring additional agricultural land into production, and which strengthen the regional agricultural economy. The Commission has accordingly added this objective to its service plan for the period 2007/2010.



    Back to top
  • Agricultural Land Commission :: 133-4940 Canada Way Burnaby, BC V5G 4K6 :: www.alc.gov.bc.ca::